Is CrushOn AI Safe? — Data, Privacy & Security Breakdown
Affiliate disclosure: This page contains referral links.
Last updated: May 2026. Privacy data sourced from Mozilla Foundation's Privacy Not Included evaluation and CrushOn AI's privacy policy.
The straight answer on CrushOn AI safety: not a malware risk, but a serious privacy concern. The platform uses SSL/TLS encryption and has no reported data breaches as of May 2026. But it received Mozilla Foundation's worst privacy rating and has documented data collection practices that users should understand before creating an account.
Safety Summary Table
| Safety Category | CrushOn AI Status |
|---|---|
| SSL/TLS encryption (in transit) | Yes |
| Data breaches reported | None as of May 2026 |
| Encryption at rest | UNCONFIRMED (Mozilla could not determine) |
| Mozilla Privacy Rating | WARNING (worst tier) |
| Trackers on first load | 45 (incl. DoubleClick) |
| Health data in policy | 23 mentions |
| Biometric data collected | Yes (face, keystrokes, voice) |
| Age verification | Self-reported 18+ checkbox |
| Trustpilot rating | 2.1/5 (13 of 14 reviews 1-star) |
| Minimum safe approach | Burner email + VPN |
What Mozilla Foundation Found
Mozilla's Privacy Not Included project independently evaluates consumer software for privacy practices. CrushOn AI received the "WARNING" label — the most serious designation in their system.
| Mozilla Finding | Detail |
|---|---|
| Overall rating | WARNING (worst tier) |
| Trackers in first minute | 45 |
| Notable trackers | DoubleClick (Google advertising) |
| Health data | Mentioned 23 times in privacy policy |
| Biometric data | Face images, keystroke dynamics, voice recordings |
| Encryption at rest | Could not confirm |
The WARNING label doesn't mean the platform is malware — it means Mozilla found the platform collects far more data than users would reasonably expect, with limited transparency about how that data is used.
Data Collection: What CrushOn AI Gathers
Categories of Data Collected
| Data Category | Collected |
|---|---|
| Email address | Yes |
| Device and network information | Yes |
| Location data | Yes |
| Chat content | Yes |
| Financial/transaction data | Yes |
| Audio data (voice recordings) | Yes |
| Visual data (face images) | Yes |
| Keystroke patterns | Yes |
| Health conditions | Yes |
| Mental health data | Yes |
| Medications | Yes |
| Gender-affirming care | Yes |
| Reproductive health | Yes |
| Sexual health | Yes |
How the Data Is Used
| Use Case | Documented |
|---|---|
| AI model training | Yes |
| Commercial purposes (advertising) | Yes |
| Marketing | Yes |
| Business analytics | Yes |
| Social media engagement | Yes |
Who Receives the Data
| Recipient | Relationship |
|---|---|
| Peekaboo Tech Ltd. | Affiliated entity |
| Peekaboo Game Ltd. | Affiliated entity |
| Third-party vendors | Service providers |
| Advertising partners | Commercial partners |
| Future acquirers | In business transactions |
Health Data: The Specific Concern
The health data collection is the most significant issue for most users.
| Health Data Type | Mentioned in Policy |
|---|---|
| Physical health conditions | Yes |
| Mental health conditions | Yes |
| Medications | Yes |
| Medical treatments | Yes |
| Gender-affirming care | Yes |
| Reproductive health | Yes |
| Sexual health | Yes |
Health data is mentioned 23 times in the privacy policy. The data use categories include commercial purposes and advertising — meaning that health-related disclosures made during roleplay or conversation could inform advertising targeting.
Age Verification Assessment
| Verification Method | Implementation |
|---|---|
| Age gate | Self-reported 18+ checkbox |
| ID verification | None |
| Document upload | None |
| Third-party age verification | None |
The self-reported checkbox is the weakest possible age verification mechanism. FindMyKids and similar child safety organizations have flagged this as insufficient. NSFW content is accessible to anyone who checks the box, regardless of actual age.
Trustpilot Review Pattern
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Overall rating | 2.1/5 stars |
| Total reviews | 14 |
| 1-star reviews | 13 |
| 5-star reviews | 1 |
| Most common complaint | AI produces "randomly generated nonsense" |
| Second complaint | AI ignores character specifications |
| Third complaint | Poor value on expensive plans |
14 total reviews is a small dataset. The extreme clustering at 1-star (93% of reviews) is statistically unusual even for a platform with real quality issues. This pattern may reflect a vocal unhappy minority rather than average user experience across 3M+ monthly active users.
Protective Measures: What to Do Before Signing Up
| Step | Priority | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Use a burner email address | High | Primary account identifier, not linked to real identity |
| Enable VPN before first visit | High | Limits location data collection at IP level |
| Use tracker-blocking browser | High | Reduces the 45-tracker exposure |
| Avoid real personal disclosures in chat | High | Chat content used for AI training |
| Disable location tracking in app settings | Medium | Reduces location data collection |
| Decline third-party sign-in options | Medium | Reduces cross-platform data linkage |
| Use strong unique password | Medium | Standard security practice |
| Request data deletion when done | Low | Takes ~48 hours via support@crushon.ai |
Has CrushOn AI Been Hacked?
No publicly reported security breaches involving CrushOn AI have been disclosed as of May 2026. The platform has not appeared in major breach notification databases.
The risk context: Mozilla could not confirm whether CrushOn AI encrypts stored data at rest. An unencrypted breach would expose stored user data in readable form — a theoretical risk that cannot currently be dismissed based on available information.
For users with high privacy sensitivity, the combination of unconfirmed encryption at rest and extensive data collection makes CrushOn AI a materially riskier choice than platforms with confirmed encryption practices.
Our Safety Verdict
CrushOn AI is usable with appropriate precautions. It is not suitable without them — particularly for users who share personal health information, real name, or location in conversations. The Mozilla WARNING label reflects real, documented issues, not theoretical risks.
For platforms with cleaner privacy records in the same use case category, see our alternatives comparison.
Frequently Asked Questions
CrushOn AI's privacy policy documents data sharing with affiliated companies (Peekaboo Tech Ltd., Inc., Game Ltd.) and third-party advertising partners for commercial purposes. Whether this meets the legal definition of "selling" depends on jurisdiction. The practical result — that your data reaches advertising partners — is documented.
Yes. Request account and data deletion by emailing support@crushon.ai from the email address associated with your account. The process typically takes approximately 48 hours for account deletion. Data deletion may take longer depending on their data processing cycle. Request both explicitly in the same email.
No. The platform contains adult content, and age verification is a self-reported checkbox with no independent verification. CrushOn AI is explicitly intended for users aged 18 and older. Content moderation is minimal — disturbing content can be present even outside intentional NSFW contexts. The platform is not appropriate for minors.
Yes, according to their documented data use in the privacy policy. Chat content is listed among data used for AI model training and improvement. This is common practice across AI platforms. Users concerned about conversation privacy should treat all chat content as potentially used for training purposes.
No major publicly reported breaches as of May 2026. The relevant risk factor is Mozilla's finding that encryption at rest could not be confirmed — meaning that in the event of a future breach, the protection of stored data cannot be verified based on current available information.